Key Findings from the sensory data
Overall mean scores (across all 150 observations):
| Attribute | Mean score |
|---|
| Appearance | 3.85 |
| Aroma | 3.99 |
| Taste | 3.92 |
| Mouth Feel | 3.83 |
| Overall Acceptability | 3.96 |
These values are on the usual 1–5 hedonic scale, so everything lies close to the positive side of the scale.
By sample code (averaged over the 30 panelists):
| Sample | Appearance | Aroma | Taste | Mouth Feel | Overall Accept. |
|---|
| 274 | 3.90 | 4.03 | 3.90 | 3.93 | 4.07 |
| 316 | 3.90 | 3.97 | 3.87 | 3.83 | 4.03 |
| 517 | 4.10 | 4.20 | 4.03 | 3.87 | 4.03 |
| 639 | 3.37 | 3.60 | 3.47 | 3.40 | 3.40 |
| 748 | 4.00 | 4.13 | 4.33 | 4.13 | 4.27 |
• Sample 748 stands out as the most liked overall (highest overall-acceptability 4.27) and also scores the best for Taste and Mouth Feel.
• Sample 517 achieves the highest Aroma score (4.20) and shares a high overall acceptability.
• Sample 639 consistently scores the lowest on every attribute.
Visual insight
You should now see two interactive bar charts:
- Overall Mean Sensory Scores – a single bar for each attribute.
- Mean Sensory Scores by Sample Code – grouped bars so you can visually compare samples across attributes.
Feel free to hover over bars to inspect exact values or to zoom in/out.
Would you like to:
- Compare samples with statistical tests (e.g.�a0ANOVA)?
- Look at the distribution of scores for each attribute?
- Explore panelist-wise behaviour?
Just let me know!